IN THE BEGINNING
THERE WILL BE THE END,
IN THE END THE BEGINNING
In the beginning there was no catenality:
neither neutrality nor unneutrality,
neither positivity nor negativity.
Then there was catenalization:
something neither neutral nor unneutral,
neither positive nor negative,
remained neither positive nor negative,
but turned into a neutral catenal.
And pristine neutrality was split asunder
into positivity and negativity,
and as much positivity as negativity.
And an open system
had the same or more of the one
and the same or less of the other.
And a neutral being
was perfect in its neutrality,
whereas an unneutral being
could become neutral-directed.
Then there was decatenalization:
something positive and/or negative
became neither positive nor negative,
something neutral on balance
neither neutral nor unneutral.
After which there was no catenality.
In the beginning there is no catenality.
Then there is catenalization.
And pristine neutrality is split asunder
into positivity and negativity,
and as much positivity as negativity.
And an open system
has the same or more of the one
and the same or less of the other.
And a neutral being
is perfect in its neutrality,
whereas an unneutral being
can become neutral-directed.
Then there is decatenalization.
After which there is no catenality.
In the beginning there will be no catenality.
Then there will be catenalization.
And pristine neutrality will be split asunder
into positivity and negativity,
and as much positivity as negativity.
And an open system
will have the same or more of the one
and the same or less of the other.
And a neutral being
will be perfect in its neutrality,
whereas an unneutral being
will be able to become neutral-directed.
Then there will be decatenalization.
In the end there will be no catenality.
Vinsent Nandi
67.MSE
|
