THE WORSHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY
Not using the word god or the name (of) God with the connotation of
something good may require some courage in a
because there one risks the wrath, not of any omnipotent god, but of the
sometimes not much less omnipotent barons of the worshipbuilding industry.
41.aSWW-74th Late Northwest
THE RIGHT TO LIVE ON THE IMMUTABLE NORMS
Our attitude towards life and nonlife and towards causing, risking or
allowing certain transitions from life to nonlife, and from nonlife to
life, should reflect our adherence to the immutable norms:
the norm of inclusivity and
the norm of neutrality.
from the Book of Fundamentals.)
THEOCENTRISM NOT OVER YET
The theocentric issue is the same for theists and atheists alike, the
future of God or gods being at stake.
Self-labeled atheists or 'antitheists' forget that all their continued
attempts at proving that God does not exist and how bad theism is, merely
serves the domain of the
while meanwhile the other domain misses out on any comparable zeal for the
evolution of a new, now
This is the main intellectual reason why the age of theocentrism is not
over yet: it is theists who keep it alive and atheists who keep it
73.ESW-74th Early Northwest
A PLANET TURNING WORSE
The continuously increasing human overpopulation of the world,
accompanied by human overconsumption, makes it turn
worse and worse at an ever madder pace.
Yet, the maddest are the men and women on this planet who are
supposed to possess the faculty of thinking, even to the extent of being
smarter than the nature they will not cease to degrade and destroy
by their number.
73.MNE-74th Late Northeast
PREFACE TO THE MODEL (2/2)
Only future generations will be able to tell how long before the year 1
the Model of Neutral-Inclusivity
was published for the first time.
Till then everyone is condemned to choose imperfect means to record the
moment an event like the first publication of this work took place.
Using a less imperfect frame of reference it may be said that this work
was printed and distributed for the first time
41 years after the end of
the Second World War.
This information also lays stress on one of the reasons for coming into
the open with the Model: that the end of the
era should not be marked by such a great catastrophe as a nuclear world
The early readers can either stay with the ignorant and reactionary who
look backward to 'the year 1', or join those who, by adopting a new
course, look forward to the year 1.
Since 41 aSWW (the 41st ordinal year) there is an alternative.
41 aSWW-74th Mid-Northeast
PREFACE TO THE MODEL (1/2)
The work on the three books of
the Model of Neutral-Inclusivity
was not supported by any governmental or private agency, institute or
organization; neither was the author while writing these books.
It is precisely because no support by any organization, group or person
with national, military, party-political, class-linked, commercial,
proprietary, traditional or other such interests was, or had to be,
solicited that this work was made possible.
Being written in an
Model is addressed to the world, or to the learned world, at large; being
inclusivistic it is not
addressed to any country, or region of the world, in particular.
41 aSWW-74th Early Northeast
THE INDIVIDUALISM THAT EVEN COLLECTIVISTS
DARE NOT CRITICIZE
Individualism and collectivism are not proper goals in themselves.
If and when these 'opposites' are treated as such, the consequences will be
Yet, it is amazing and disturbing that one expression of individualism is
never mentioned, except, perhaps, by totalitarians who think that
everything is the state's business: the idea that a human being is free
to have as many children as she or he wants, regardless of its negative
impact on our common environment, regardless of the destruction of nature
by human overpopulation and human overconsumption together.
In this connection individualism (with a fixation on rights) and
collectivism (with a fixation on duties) are two of a kind.
73.LSE-73rd Late Southwest
THE MONSTROUS MIXTURE
OF THEO- AND EGOCENTRISM
The mixture of theocentrism and egocentrism in one person's mind is a
It will speak in terms of "God chose me to be something to a degree in
which He did not choose other people to be" and "God asked or commanded me
to do something in a way which He did not ask or command other people to
It becomes a social monster when the two are combined in one group's
(tribe's, nation's) mental culture: "God elected us to be something to a
degree which He did not elect any other group (tribe, nation) to be" and
"God asked or commanded us to do something in a way which He did not ask
or command any other group (tribe, nation) to do".
It is great when people define 'sustainable development goals' and try to
SDG will help to combat the bad effects of human overconsumption.
It is outrageous when (the same) people refuse to think about a
'sustainable population equilibrium' and its good effects.
We need to pay SPE-cial attention to SPE in order to combat human
overpopulation on Earth, the other cause of the degradation of the natural
environment, if not the destruction of all human-scale nature.
73.LSE-73rd Early Southwest
SCIENCE OR RELIGION
Science can be wrong and scientists can work with terms and theories which
are more ideological than scientific, but where it is being threatened
there is only one alternative to science: supernaturalism, of which the
strongest brand is religion.
73.MSE-73rd Late Southeast
THE FALLACY OF THE ONE-SIDED COIN
For the sake of convenience (and their own conviction) there are people
who tend to forget that a coin has two sides: they see a coin with a
symbolic image or text on it which they consider good (or, at any rate not
bad) and do not understand at all why others would consider it bad.
These unilateral coin characters show a complete lack of understanding,
because they think that those who disapprove of the image or text and even
express their dissatisfaction make a fuss about nothing.
At the same time they have no idea whatsoever of the fuss made by the
proponents of the image or text in question to get and/or keep it on the
coin in the first place.
Those who do not take into account that something that is important enough
to be used as a symbol can play an equally important role as an antisymbol
commit the fallacy of the one-sided coin.
NEITHER THE SELF NOR THE OTHER
Both complete egoism and complete altruism are exclusivist failures.
While the self may be the sole concern in a context where there is no
other, it cannot be in any larger context.
73.LNW-73rd Early Southeast
THE SHORTEST SATISFACTION
Honor for the honor — the biggest for the size — money
for the money — the most for the quantity — power for the
power — the longest for the length: none of them know lasting
73.LNW-73rd Central Month
A COUNTRY VIEW, NOT A WORLDVIEW
A so-called 'world(-)view' which is
any-particular-country-centered is a normative monstrosity.
Only a 'country view' may be one-particular-country-centered or, in
traditional terms, patriotic.
If what is supposed to be a (religion or a nonreligious) worldview
manifests tribalism or nationalism, it is not a worldview but an
exclusivist country view.
73.MNW-73rd Late Northwest
TWO KINDS OF RELATIONSHIP
Human beings are born into this world with two kinds of relationship: one
with their mother, their father, the human beings nearby and far away;
the other with their immediate natural environment and all of nature,
especially human-scale nature, on this planet.
To live a full human life you will have to be nourished, and you will
have to nourish, both of them.
THE ADMINISTERING ANGEL
In the past the church used to be blessed with many ministering angels: the
state that observed the religious holidays and waged the sectarian wars,
the state that paid the buildings and the priests (whatever they were
called), or, if it did not do so directly, then indirectly with all sorts
of exemptions, the state that took care of the theocentrist propaganda on
the flag, in the national anthem, on the money, and wherever possible, the
state that confined civil marriage to a marriage between one man and one
woman, and so on and so forth.
However, with the advent of human rights, and recently even the idea of an
inclusive society, none of these benefits are self-evident anymore.
Nowadays, there is only one angel left, an angel that administers what
remains of the estate; one that desperately keeps things in the old order
or tries to bring them back to it.
A world war between the churches (whatever they are called) of the One Holy
Book and of the other Holy Book may drive people back to the one or the
other church temporarily, when they will be forced to take sides.
After that, and also without such a terrible conflict, the administering
last angel of the church will stay behind, shattered and baffled by so
much emphasis on norms and values which the church never knew in 'her'
72.MSW-73rd Early Northwest
Community spirit may be something beautiful; it may be something ugly
(albeit, perhaps, under a different label).
The question is what it is determined to create, to maintain or to destroy
(regardless of whether this community spirit is something to the material
advantage or disadvantage of yourself).
73.ENE-73rd Late Northeast
THE INS AND OUTS OF 'AN INCLUSIVE SOCIETY'
It has become fashionable in some circles to speak of 'an inclusive
But are these people aware of what it means for a society to be inclusive
without being exclusivistic?
(The diverseniks and exclusivist impostors may not even care.)
They may know some of the ins but too few of the outs.
ONE NATION, NEUTRAL AND INCLUSIVE
Should you ever be forced to choose between One Nation Under
God and One Nation, Neutral and Inclusive, choose the latter
for the good of everyone, theocentrists included.
60.LNE-73rd Early Northeast
NOTHING CHANGES, NOTHING ENDURES
In the realm of the ultimate everything is at rest, nothing flows.
In the realm of the instrumental everything is in a state of flux,
nothing stays still.
nothing changes but the nonultimate,
nothing endures but the ultimate.
44.ENE-72nd Late Southwest
Some people claim that they are not willing to base themselves on what
human beings make up now, and then surrender themselves to what one man
cooked up one thousand or even thousands of years ago.
Be fruitful ... ... NO MORE
Be fruitful and multiply NO MORE THAN GOOD FOR A NATURAL EQUILIBRIUM.
70.MSW-72nd Early Southwest
BE FRUITFUL ... ... no more
BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY no more than good for a natural equilibrium.
70.MSW-72nd Late Southeast
INCLUDE YOU YOURSELVES
If the Other or others draw one or more irrelevant distinctions and do not
include you, do not draw the same distinction or distinctions but include
you yourself or yourselves.
FORMULA OF THE NORM (2)
norm of inclusivity is the
ground-norm obtained by taking the universal version of the
non-metadoctrinal, nonpropositional principle of
discriminational, nondoxastic relevance and
by interpreting it in a catenically neutralistic way.
In short: it is the neutralistic interpretation of the principle of
41 aSWW-72nd Early Southeast
FORMULA OF THE NORM (1)
norm of neutrality is the
ground-norm obtained by taking the non-metadoctrinal, nonpropositional
principle of catenated neutrality and by refining or interpreting it in a
In short: it is the relevantistic interpretation of the principle of
41 aSWW-72nd Central Month
THE FIRST MOON LANDING
The first moon landing may have been an index of the technological
achievements of mankind, it has not in a comparable way been an index of
any cultural progress of humankind.
40.LSW-72nd Late Northwest
TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY
The choice is between temporarily or permanently.
Be liberal and allow the spread of dictatorial ideas, be inclusive and
allow the spread of exclusivism, and your society shall be as you want
it to be, temporarily.
Be liberal or inclusive and let dictatorial ideas or exclusivism
not dominate or gain ground, and your society shall be as you want it to
DISTINGUISHING FANTASY FROM FACT
Supernaturalists may be good at distinguishing fantasy from fact.
When it comes to the crunch they are incapable of distinguishing fact
71.ESE-72nd Early Northwest
INCLUSIVITY YES, UNLESS;
DIVERSITY NO, ALTHO
Explanation: inclusivity yes, unless so-called "inclusivity" (or
"inclusiveness") fails to distinguish between the relevant and
the irrelevant, and attempts to include exclusivist thought,
symbolism and/or action; diversity no, because
diversity in itself is a
value —the more diverse the better—
altho in practice
inclusivity often embraces a great deal of diversity —but not as an
end in itself— in the way it includes very diverse people, living
beings and things.
71.ENW-72nd Late Northeast
A 'MORE INCLUSIVE' RELIGION
Those who nowadays still like religion to be more liberal,
tolerant or inclusive (read "less
exclusivistic") resemble the people who used to go to
work by horse and wanted much faster horses at a time that the car had
already been invented.
LITERALISTS OF RELIGIOUS FICTION
The literalists of ancient or more recent religious fiction are, by direct
implication, the most supernaturalistic and,
by indirect implication, the most exclusivistic of
Yet, literally these so-called 'literalists' do not exist, for they will
always cherry-pick the passages from the ancient Holy Books they find
attractive and enforceable, while keeping silent about the
passages which even in the eyes of not entirely brainwashed members of
their own flock are silly or pathological, if not
71.LNW-72nd Early Northeast