5 |
DENOMINATIONAL OBSERVANCES |
5.1 |
FORMS OF ACTION AND NONACTION,
THOUGHT AND NONTHOUGHT |
5.1.1 |
THE MEANING OF DENOMINATIONAL OBSERVANCES |
The term observance has several meanings. As to our
denominational doctrine it has two meanings: a fundamentalist
besides a symbolist one. The fundamentalist meaning is that of
act or instance of obeying, or conforming one's action or
practise to, a rule. In this sense every adherent of
the DNI
has simply to observe three rules: the veridicalist principle of
truth, the neutralist principle of
relevance and the
relevantist principle of
neutrality.
The symbolist meaning
of observance, on the other hand, is customary practise or
ceremony or act or instance of following a custom, of performing
certain institutionalized actions or ceremonies, or of celebrating or
solemnizing after a customary form. The tradition, custom
or ceremony in this definition do not refer to a social or
cultural norm of following a fundamental principle in general
but to more specific systems of social or cultural norms. To the
extent that such a system is symbolic, the performance of a
traditional ceremony or action is not even a specific way of
observing a fundamental rule in a direct sense. If contributing
to fundamental values at all, symbolist observances only have
such an effect indirectly.
When speaking of "denominational observances" in this book,
we will refer to symbolic observances, such as the celebration of
denominational feast-days and the solemnization of one's
communion with nature and with other people. In our denominational
doctrine these observances can be clearly distinguished from the
fundamental ones, something that is often impossible with
respect to a religious observance. Thus, when the purport of a
religious feast is not just the commemoration of a certain event
but the honoring of a particular deity, the observance of the
rule to periodically honor that deity may be a fundamental,
intrinsic duty in the religion concerned. The neutral-inclusivist
position with regard to symbolic observances is that they must
not, on the whole, promote unneutralism, exclusivism,
supernaturalism or authoritarianism. Preferably they should
contribute to the advancement of the
Ananormative ideals to a
noticeable degree, at least by enhancing the influence of
the Norm itself.
Some early readers of this Model might find the attempt to
introduce 'new traditions' self-contradictory, but the
contradiction at issue is then merely one in terms. For what are
introduced here are proposals for what symbolists should or
can observe, not a prediction of what they will observe. It is
only after neutralists have indeed observed one or more of these
proposals on a certain scale and for a certain time that one can
rightfully speak of "a tradition" or "custom". That, however,
does not affect the coherence and the value of the original proposal.
Given that a symbolist proposal (whether it has to do with
denominational observances or other forms of symbolism) is
coherent and valuable, it may not yet be accepted in the course
of time, because other, comparable suggestions may be made at a
later moment which are also coherent and more valuable. This
does not render the original proposal unacceptable, only
unaccepted. Since the DNI's denominational symbolism is
optional, nonacceptance is in itself nothing to be concerned
about (providing that the nonacceptance of neutral-inclusivist symbols
does not go with the acceptance or perpetuation of exclusivist
or other incompatible symbols). The sole thing to be concerned
about is that alternative proposals which are accepted, and
which will become traditional in the future, are as good or
better.
The kind of denominational observance which will be
elaborated most in this chapter is the observance of suprapersonal,
special days. We will treat of this form of nonfundamental
symbolism in
the next division. Suprapersonal special days
must be distinguished from personal special days like the day someone
is cremated or buried. A ceremony which can be held on such a
day will be discussed in
the last section of this division. In
the two preceding sections we will first consider states of
thought, nonthought and thoughtful action which are in a
symbolic way 'deeper' than usual, or which are in a symbolic way
'closer' than usual to other living or existing beings, or to
living beings that have died.
|